FATCA & OECD CRS non-reporting countries as of 2024


Countries with an excellent or good banking infrastructure that do not report to FATCA or OECD CRS

  1. Comoros
  2. Dominican Republic
  3. Armenia
  4. Botswana
  5. Guatemala
  6. Cambodia
  7. North Macedonia
  8. Philippines 
  9. Bahrein


Other Non-Participants in both FATCA and OECD CRS:

  1. Afghanistan
  2. Algeria
  3. Angola
  4. Antigua and Barbuda
  5. Bangladesh
  6. Barbados
  7. Belize
  8. Benin
  9. Burkina Faso
  10. Burundi
  11. Cameroon
  12. Central African Republic
  13. Chad
  14. Congo (Democratic Republic)
  15. Congo (Republic)
  16. Côte d'Ivoire
  17. Djibouti
  18. Dominica
  19. Egypt
  20. El Salvador
  21. Equatorial Guinea
  22. Eritrea
  23. Eswatini
  24. Ethiopia
  25. Fiji
  26. Gabon
  27. Gambia
  28. Ghana
  29. Grenada
  30. Guinea
  31. Guinea-Bissau
  32. Guyana
  33. Haiti
  34. Honduras
  35. Iraq
  36. Jordan
  37. Kiribati
  38. Kosovo
  39. Kuwait
  40. Kyrgyzstan
  41. Laos
  42. Lebanon
  43. Lesotho
  44. Liberia
  45. Libya
  46. Madagascar
  47. Malawi
  48. Maldives
  49. Mali
  50. Mauritania
  51. Micronesia
  52. Mongolia (joining CRS in 2026)
  53. Morocco (joining CRS in 2025)
  54. Mozambique
  55. Myanmar
  56. Namibia
  57. Nepal
  58. Nicaragua
  59. Niger
  60. North Korea
  61. Palau
  62. Papua New Guinea (joining CRS in 2027)
  63. Paraguay
  64. Rwanda (joining CRS in 2025)
  65. Samoa
  66. São Tomé and Príncipe
  67. Senegal (joining CRS in 2025)
  68. Serbia
  69. Sierra Leone
  70. Solomon Islands
  71. Somalia
  72. South Sudan
  73. Sri Lanka
  74. Sudan
  75. Suriname
  76. Syria
  77. Tajikistan
  78. Tanzania
  79. Timor Leste
  80. Togo
  81. Tonga
  82. Tunisia (joining CRS in 2025)
  83. Turkmenistan
  84. Tuvalu
  85. Uganda (joining CRS in 2025)
  86. Uzbekistan
  87. Vatican City
  88. Venezuela
  89. Vietnam
  90. Yemen
  91. Zambia
  92. Zimbabwe


Notable Absences:

  1. The United States does not participate in the OECD CRS for active companies (excluding investment companies or holdings), but enforces the FATCA regulations.

OECD CRS 

Each year, the OECD Common Reporting Standard (CRS) marks July 31st as a pivotal deadline for the international exchange of financial information for our European customers. By this date, financial institutions in the world must report account details to the European tax authorities, covering the previous year’s account activities.

Significance of the OECD CRS

The OECD CRS plays a critical role in the EU's strategy to implement wealth and rich taxes. Financial institutions are required to submit account master data and balances, though they do not report specific transaction details. Currently, 111 countries participate in this exchange, with notable exceptions like the United States.

In 2023, Georgia joined the CRS framework, while eight countries, including Russia and Ukraine, do not participate. Major financial hubs and tax havens are involved, highlighting the legal aspect of holding foreign accounts without mandatory reporting for holding accounts abroad.

Corporate Accounts

The CRS distinguishes between different types of corporate accounts. Active operational companies are exempt from reporting, whereas passive income-generating companies are included. Misclassification by banks can lead to incorrect information being exchanged.

USA and FATCA

The United States has opted out of the OECD CRS and instead enforces FATCA. American banks require a U.S. tax identification number to open accounts, and accounts held by U.S. entities are not covered by the CRS.

Future Implications

There is potential for an EU wealth tax based on CRS data, particularly targeting wealth management structures. A global wealth tax is also under consideration, with significant input from economist Gabriel Zucman, who advises the EU on tax strategies.

Preparations

Planning for future tax measures is crucial. It is advisable to move assets to non-EU countries to evade potential EU wealth taxes and establish a contingency plan to ensure financial security and freedom. Historical precedents underscore the importance of timely action.

Immediate preparations are recommended to safeguard financial freedom and assets from future regulations. Acting now, rather than making hasty decisions later, is vital for long-term security.